Jump to content

Talk:DFDS Seaways

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

History

[edit]

So where is the "history"? A section on the history of a company should not usually start The company has recently (2006) renewed their fleet... Skinsmoke (talk) 18:45, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Fully agree. The history section contains nothing on how the company formed, what mergers and acquisitions it undertook, and so on. To compound the problem, the list of incidents all occur between 2013 and 2014, and it's unclear which, if any, are likely to stand the test of time. I'll have a look at the article and see what I can do. —BillC talk 18:50, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on DFDS Seaways. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 12:36, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"Seways" suffix

[edit]

"All the fleet were to lose the 'Seaways' suffix from their names, and would instead receive local preference names" - which, apparently, didn't happen, the "Seaways" suffix is still there. Why? The sentence could just be removed, I suppose, but I would prefer an update with references. Gestumblindi (talk) 18:36, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]