Talk:Dan Gibson
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
NPOV Concerns
[edit]This article doesn't seem very neutral or encyclopaedic. Phrases such as "creating in all of us a deeper appreciation for the natural world in which we live" and "opened peoples’ eyes to both the beauty of nature and the need for its survival" are flowery, unnecessary, and add nothing to the article. This style is so intertwined with the informational content, however, that this article should probably be completely rewritten. It's not that there isn't any useful information, it just isn't presented like it should be. Also, the ending is rather abrupt. There should be some sort of conclusion. 74.36.127.18 19:25, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
- You are completely correct. Dan was a substantial man whose personality actually transcended his accomplishments. I will begin an overhaul of this page and try to reflect your valid critique. - Gordon Gibson 2607:FEA8:5760:E200:60EF:4F1:2EB7:C67C (talk) 17:34, 18 May 2024 (UTC)