Talk:Dear Octopus
Appearance
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
Requested move
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: Page to be moved. No opposition and request seems well grounded. Also, as BD2412 suggests, the disambiguation page won't be needed any more so I will request the move to take place direclty over the top of that. Note: page move not yet completed as the target paget needs to be removed first. I have requested this, or any competent admin could complete it. (non-admin closure) — Amakuru (talk) 23:51, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
Dear Octopus (play) → Dear Octopus – The play appears to be significantly better known than the film adaptation, and so should be treated as the primary meaning, the film can be treated as a hatnote. PatGallacher (talk) 17:11, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
- Support, the play does seem to have had a far greater reach than the film (which is itself merely an adaptation of the play). The disambiguation page is a WP:TWODABS trifle, and can be obliterated. bd2412 T 20:41, 26 December 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.