Talk:Decisionism
Appearance
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
[edit]I made this partial translation of de:Dezisionismus. Please feel free to make it presentable. --Thorsen 12:49, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
The last part, on Habermas, seems absolutely unacceptable! Isn't it? Velho 23:51, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
I am not sure how one would be able to expound the meaning of Decisionism in a wikipedia article, but this cannot be that, since it is exactly the same as positivism, which Schmitt clearly was against. So, either there must be a difference which should be explained, or if a difference is lacking then Schmitt's position is incoherent and decisionism goes away as a meaningful category. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 160.39.140.47 (talk) 17:42, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
Categories:
- Stub-Class Germany articles
- Unknown-importance Germany articles
- WikiProject Germany articles
- Stub-Class Philosophy articles
- Low-importance Philosophy articles
- Stub-Class ethics articles
- Low-importance ethics articles
- Ethics task force articles
- Stub-Class social and political philosophy articles
- Low-importance social and political philosophy articles
- Social and political philosophy task force articles
- Stub-Class law articles
- Unknown-importance law articles
- WikiProject Law articles