Talk:Delta–Mendota Canal

California Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 23 January 2020 and 22 May 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Pinedoa93.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 19:15, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Delta–Mendota Canal. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110327122453/http://www.usbr.gov/projects/Project.jsp?proj_Name=Delta%20Division%20Project to http://www.usbr.gov/projects/Project.jsp?proj_Name=Delta%20Division%20Project

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:08, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pinedoa93 (talk) 22:52, 15 February 2020 (UTC)User:Pinedoa93 I believed it was important to add some background information as to why the Delta-Canal was added to be part of the Central Valley Project. Also thought it was essential to include that the federal government took charge of the Projects, which may or may not reflect flaws in the water project.Pinedoa93 (talk) 22:52, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pinedoa93 (talk) 23:33, 10 May 2020 (UTC)Pinedoa93: I added more needed information about the Central Valley Project and who began building the canal, how studies are being done to improve the quality of water and availability of water, the types of activities that can be done on the canal.[reply]

California Aquaduct- Why does no one mention that they sell the water? Cutting farmers water by 20% two years in a row has decimated the farmers. Newsom is more interested in the Bullet train. Which will fail miserably. 2600:8800:2806:6100:D1B0:A925:E66B:6985 (talk) 18:38, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]