Talk:Demographics of Kosovo
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to Eastern Europe or the Balkans, which has been designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
![]() | Text and/or other creative content from Demographic history of Kosovo was copied or moved into Demographics of Kosovo. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
|
||
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
Too much credit on disputed census
[edit]According to the article both 1991 and 2011 census are disputed, the first being boycotted by Albanians the second by Serbians. In an article called Demographics of Kosovo it is an exaggeration to add the full table of a disputed census -- it would be fine on articles called 2011 or 1991 Population Census for Kosovo. I mean, there are a lot of sentences in the article that state facts in an undisputed manner (for instance ethnicity percentages) and the size of tables with exact numbers imply accuracy on the subject that is clearly not there, not when other parts of the article state clearly that this numbers are not to be trusted. Now I am not telling that this census does not deserve an extensive part of the article, but the current size would be better moved in a new article. Κλειδοκράτωρ (talk) 18:24, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
HISTORIC VIEW
[edit]YEAR АLBAN. SERBS ОTHERS 1455[2] 1 % 98 % 1 % 1871 32 % 64 % 4 % 1899 48 % 44 % 8 % 1921 66 % 26 % 8 % 1931 69 % ?? % ? % 1939 60 % 34 % 5 % 1948 68 % 27 % 5 % 1953 65 % 27 % 6 % 1961 67 % 27 % 6 % 1971 74 % 21 % 5 % 1981 77 % 15 % 8 % 1991 82 % 11 % 7 % 20002 88 % 7 % 5 % 20072 92 % 5 % 3 % — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.155.46.15 (talk) 10:38, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
Strange mathematics
[edit]In every country or people group, people born decades earlier eventually die, meanwhile in Kosovo you have decades long birth numbers between 40 and 50 000, but decades later only 9 -8 000 people die. Its unnatural, while birth rate is dropping from nearly 60 000 in late 80s and early 90s, to today's 22 000, death rate stays same as in 50s and 40s. In every other demographic chart you can see that by those numbers death rate in Kosovo would be between 40 000 and 50 000 people in last decade. If only 8-9 000 people die it would mean that the population of Kosovo is more akin to 200-300 000 people and not 1.7 or 1.8 million.
Population Pyramid
[edit]An updated population pyramid of Kosovo is needed for this article to be consistent with other articles about Demographics of countries.Bird Vision (talk)
Vital Sttistics 2021
[edit]What sources do you have fir the Vital Statistics of 2021? Çfar burimi ke për këta statistikat e Lindjeve dhe Vdekjeve në vitin 2021? 2A01:C23:75CB:BE00:A471:DB8E:219C:5E41 (talk) 22:50, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
- Check sources number 18, 19, 20, 21 here. Ktrimi991 (talk) 23:02, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
Orphaned references in Demographics of Kosovo
[edit]I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Demographics of Kosovo's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
Reference named "Small-Arms-Survey":
- From Kosovo Force: Khakee, Anna; Florquin, Nicolas (1 June 2003). "Kosovo: Difficult Past, Unclear Future" (PDF). Kosovo and the Gun: A Baseline Assessment of Small Arms and Light Weapons in Kosovo. 10. Pristina, United Nations Interim Administration Mission in Kosovo and Geneva, Switzerland: Small Arms Survey: 4–6. JSTOR resrep10739.9. Archived (PDF) from the original on 30 June 2022. Retrieved 3 March 2023.
Kosovo—while still formally part of the so-called State Union of Serbia and Montenegro dominated by Serbia—has, since the war, been a United Nations protectorate under the United Nations Interim Administration Mission in Kosovo (UNMIK). [...] However, members of the Kosovo Serb minority of the territory (circa 6–7 per cent in 2000) have, for the most part, not been able to return to their homes. For security reasons, the remaining Kosovo Serb enclaves are, in part, isolated from the rest of Kosovo and protected by the multinational NATO-led Kosovo Force (KFOR).
- From Kosovo Serbs: Khakee, Anna; Florquin, Nicolas (1 June 2003). "Kosovo: Difficult Past, Unclear Future" (PDF). Kosovo and the Gun: A Baseline Assessment of Small Arms and Light Weapons in Kosovo. 10. Pristina, United Nations Interim Administration Mission in Kosovo and Geneva, Switzerland: Small Arms Survey: 4–6. JSTOR resrep10739.9. Archived from the original (PDF) on 30 June 2022. Retrieved 3 March 2023.
Kosovo—while still formally part of the so-called State Union of Serbia and Montenegro dominated by Serbia—has, since the war, been a United Nations protectorate under the United Nations Interim Administration Mission in Kosovo (UNMIK). [...] However, members of the Kosovo Serb minority of the territory (circa 6–7 per cent in 2000) have, for the most part, not been able to return to their homes. For security reasons, the remaining Kosovo Serb enclaves are, in part, isolated from the rest of Kosovo and protected by the multinational NATO-led Kosovo Force (KFOR).
- From Serbs: Khakee, Anna; Florquin, Nicolas (1 June 2003). "Kosovo: Difficult Past, Unclear Future" (PDF). Kosovo and the Gun: A Baseline Assessment of Small Arms and Light Weapons in Kosovo. 10. Pristina, United Nations Interim Administration Mission in Kosovo and Geneva, Switzerland: Small Arms Survey: 4–6. JSTOR resrep10739.9. Archived from the original (PDF) on 30 June 2022. Retrieved 3 March 2023.
Kosovo—while still formally part of the so-called State Union of Serbia and Montenegro dominated by Serbia—has, since the war, been a United Nations protectorate under the United Nations Interim Administration Mission in Kosovo (UNMIK). [...] However, members of the Kosovo Serb minority of the territory (circa 6–7 per cent in 2000) have, for the most part, not been able to return to their homes. For security reasons, the remaining Kosovo Serb enclaves are, in part, isolated from the rest of Kosovo and protected by the multinational NATO-led Kosovo Force (KFOR).
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. Feel free to remove this comment after fixing the refs. AnomieBOT⚡ 13:06, 1 June 2023 (UTC)