Talk:Desmond Doyle

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Ireland Low‑importance

	Ireland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject IrelandTemplate:WikiProject IrelandIreland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that an image or photograph of Desmond Doyle be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Untitled

I'm really concerned about this article but do not have any knowledge other than the film and Evelyn Doyle's book to go off. Of course, the film could be very skewed and Evelyn's account need not be accurate either, but what is a certainty is that the article neither references the major salient points made in it nor does the manner of its composition imply much faith, given in particular the number of typographical/spelling errors.

Films are notoriously massaged for dramatic effect, autobiographical books often are, but the discrepancies in this instances are astounding. I would presume that most of the facts are available as a matter of public record given the Supreme Court hearing - can anyone substantiate the massive variation between this article and the book/film please? 86.24.124.69 (talk) 00:09, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

In the absence of sources, these violent personal attacks against Doyle must be considered vandalism. I have reverted. _R_ (talk) 21:01, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]