Jump to content

Talk:Digital obsolescence

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 2 September 2021 and 20 December 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Flanagan Institute Applicant. Peer reviewers: Serialsgirl, Grannanj, Mgordier.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 20:05, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 28 January 2019 and 14 May 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Librarian Elsewhere.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 19:31, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled

[edit]

I found it weird that WinAmp and OpenOffice were mentioned as programs which have file formats designed for these programs only. Winamp is primarily used to play MP3, which is certanily not a Winamp-specific format. OpenOffice supports a number of different formats, such as the rather general RTF and the most-used MS doc, and the OpenDocument which I think is the first open document format accepted as an ISO standard.

Thus, I removed Winamp and OpenOffice from the examples list. --Itangalo (talk) 10:35, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Incompatible, not?

[edit]

The article says, "versions of Microsoft Works, before Works 4.5, cannot be run under Windows 2000." I don't believe that's true. Although it isn't easy, according to http://support.microsoft.com/kb/246573 you can install it (and, I presume, run it) if you do certain things described in that article. However, I'm not revising the article in case there is some issue that I'm not aware of; but if there is, there should be a citation. Mcswell (talk) 04:32, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Digital obsolescence. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:53, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Floppy disks are an example of hardware digital obsolescence?

[edit]

Computers don't come with Floppy drive bays anymore, but they're readily available in low cost, brand new models that can be used with a USB interface on any modern PC. Looking at shopping websites, you can find the drives and unused old floppies, however finding truly newly manufactured ones seems pretty hard. Does that count as digital obsolescence? according to the definition used here, I don't think so. Seems more like technical obsolescence in general. Maybe better examples would be reel-to-reel tape or old cameras that require proprietary cables/storage media.

Felipe lorenzzon (talk) 20:05, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bibliographic Sources for Student Editing Project

[edit]

Hello, I am the current student editor for this page, and the following is a list of new sources (which will be in a state of flux as the project evolves) that I have collected for my editing project, for feedback and recommendations:

  • Inns, S., & Inns, S. (2018, May 29). Domesday86.com. Retrieved October 2, 2021, from https://www.domesday86.com
  • Rosenthal, D. S. H. (2010). Format obsolescence: Assessing the threat and the defenses. Library Hi Tech, 28(2), 195–210. https://doi.org/10.1108/07378831011047613
  • Rubio, F. D., & Wharton, G. (2020). The work of art in the age of Digital Fragility. Public Culture, 32(1), 215–245. https://doi.org/10.1215/08992363-7816365
  • Duranti, L. (2005). The long-term preservation of accurate and Authentic Digital Data: The INTERPARES project. Data Science Journal, 4, 106–118. https://doi.org/10.2481/dsj.4.106
  • Le Meur, J.-Y., & Tarocco, N. (2019). The obsolescence of Information and Information Systems CERN Digital Memory Project. EPJ Web of Conferences, 214, 09003. https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/201921409003
  • Deljanin, S. (2012). DIGITAL OBSOLESCENCE. INFOtheca-Journal of Informatics & Librarianship, 13(1).
  • Roedl, David James. "Making Things Last: Digital Obsolescence and its Resistance by DIY Culture." Order No. 10151383 Indiana University, 2016. Ann Arbor.
  • Fitzpatrick, K. (2018). Obsolescence and Innovation in the Age of the Digital. The Routledge Companion to Media Studies and Digital Humanities, 329-335.
  • "Managing Digital Obsolescence Risks". The National Archives. April 2009.
  • Rothenberg, J. (1998). Avoiding Technological Quicksand: Finding a Viable Technical Foundation for Digital Preservation
  • "Introduction to Digital Preservation: Risks to digital assets". Oxford LibGuides. Jul 29, 2021, from https://libguides.bodleian.ox.ac.uk/digitalpreservation/risks

Thank you. Flanagan Institute Applicant (talk) 15:30, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sandbox Leader Draft

[edit]

Hello. I have added a sandbox draft to a new Leader section for the Digital Obsolescence article as part of my education project assignment, and would appreciate feedback and critiques.

Thank you. Flanagan Institute Applicant (talk) 23:44, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]