Talk:Discectomy
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
|
![]() | Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Discectomy.
|
When to Have Surgery
[edit]If you suffer from sciatica pain, it's important to know that, no matter how severe the symptoms are, it will often resolve on its own. That said, of people that do get better spontaneously, most do so in the first 6 to 8 weeks.
Early discectomy surgery is recommended for people that have such severe pain that they cannot function, have significant neurologic deficits (like leg weakness or bowel or bladder incontinence). For pretty much every one else, a 6-8 week trial of non-operative management is recommended. Typically, this treatment includes physical therapy, medications, and, occasionally, shots in the back called epidural steroid injections. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Truumees (talk • contribs) 21:38, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
Alternatives to Discectomy
[edit]For the purposes of this article, the term discectomy will be used to imply modern approaches to disc decompression, which include a laminotomy (expanding the window between the lamina bones in the back) and a microscopic, partial discectomy (removing only the piece of disc that's out of place, typically under microscopic or loupe (surgical telescopes) magnification). A laminectomy requires removing the entire lamina bone. This is not usually needed for a discectomy, but the same term if often used. Similarly, the whole disc is not typically removed, just the part out of place, hence a partial discectomy, but, usually the term discectomy is used. While the term micro- is not always used, most of these procedure are done with magnification of one kind or another.
Non-operative management is not really an alternative in that patients should not have discectomy surgery unless they have failed to get better with non-operative treatment. That said, unless you have major weakness or bowel and bladder problems, one option is to wait.
Laser surgery is often recommended for patients with disc problems. Unfortunately, there is little evidence that LASER adds anything of value to the procedure. In fact, LASERS provide heat, which the nerves do not like. Most respected neurosurgical and orthopaedic spine surgeons do NOT use lasers.
Chiropractic may offer short term pain relief in some, but a number of studies have shown that it does not change the outcomes in disc herniation patients. Most people get better simply because they would have gotten better no matter what.
Spine fusions are offered to patients with disc problems and have a legitimate role in those who keep herniating the same disc or those that have instability of the spine (a slippage or spondylolisthesis). Fusions are also considered in patients with months or years of severe low back pain. A fusion is a much bigger operation than a microdiscectomy.
Disc replacement surgery is not done in lieu of discectomy, but rather in lieu of spine fusion. Unfortunately, disc replacements are reasonable in only a small percentage of patients. In the low back, these procedures are done for back pain, not for sciatica.
Disc/Annular techniques include a whole host of procedures in which a catheter is inserted into the disc through a needle. Various modalities like heat, radiofrequency energy or UV light are used to "cook" the disc. Theoretically, these techniques tighten the colagen in the disc and the material retracts, thereby taking pressure off the nerve. For sciatica patients, evidence supporting these procedures is pretty sparse. Moreover, to "fix" the displaced part of the disc that's causing pressure, these techniques harm the remaining disc that the body needs as a shock absorber. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Truumees (talk • contribs) 21:50, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Discectomy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100825035947/http://www.med.nyu.edu/hjd/hjdspine/education/glossary/definitionlist.html to http://www.med.nyu.edu/hjd/hjdspine/education/glossary/definitionlist.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:38, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion
[edit]The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 12:54, 1 October 2020 (UTC)