Jump to content

Talk:Don't touch my junk

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

I'm seriously questioning the value of this article as wikipedia material. I think this page should be deleted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DNJH (talkcontribs) 18:52, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I agree.74.191.67.11 (talk) 20:28, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I agree as well, what a load of rubbish 58.169.224.91 (talk) 21:26, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia is not a paper encyclopedia. We can and do have articles on topics like Strategery, Truthiness, the Internets, and Don't touch my junk. That's part of the fun of it. Stonemason89 (talk) 00:35, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That's the funniest Did You Know I've seen... brilliantly worded --Hermajesty21 (talk) 22:00, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Notability is established? I fail to see how your logic works here. First this phrase has been said long before 9/11. Using "junk" to refer to genitals is fairly common slang. Just because a few people or articles used a word, in this case "junk" in connection with some topic, doesn't usurp that word or phrase's general meaning. This article is like an article that says "Keep the tip" and associating it with getting a takeaway pizza. I could probably find references where "keep the tip" is used in regards to ordering pizza, but the phrase has meaning outside of that narrow scope. Any phrase becomes "notable" under your thinking if a handful of authors use it in connection with some topic. You know what's junk? This article. Jason Quinn (talk) 18:12, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

DYKSTATS

[edit]

While featured on the main page, this article received 7,700 pageviews. Stonemason89 (talk) 03:55, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Don't touch my junk. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:49, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Don't touch my junk. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:26, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]