Talk:Dragons of Summer Flame
![]() | This article was previously nominated for deletion. The result of the discussion was keep. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Synopsis
[edit]Could somone rewrite the synopsis? It doesn't go into any detail, and sounds like it was written by some asshole who just wanted to spoil the story. 75.105.128.56 (talk) 00:37, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
- It has been rewritten from then. No points of the plot spoiled from my current summary. Feel free to add whatever you can think of though. Dream Focus 20:27, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
- You might want to check the history on that, as he was referring to this version[1] which had neither spoilers nor actual content. -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 21:45, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
- No lie, the "Plot summary" is about half the story. Should be renamed "Plot setup". —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.185.73.179 (talk) 05:09, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
- You might want to check the history on that, as he was referring to this version[1] which had neither spoilers nor actual content. -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 21:45, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
- It has been rewritten from then. No points of the plot spoiled from my current summary. Feel free to add whatever you can think of though. Dream Focus 20:27, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
Bah! Either write a normal plot, or remove it entirely. This 'removed material' covers 9% of the book, unlike the Chaos War article, which actually describes 100% of the plot. Do you disagree? 178.49.18.203 (talk) 07:10, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
- Since the chaos war only happened in that one book, it starting when they released Chaos, and ending when they defeated him in the end, why does it have its own article? Parts of it could be summarized and put here in the book article, that making more sense. I say merge it over here. Dream Focus 09:24, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
Infobox
[edit]This edit by Dream Focus is simply a mistake. There's agreement now that a book's date of publication and publisher should be on the same field; in technical language, the date of publication field has been deprecated. Maybe I should have made that clear in my edit summary, but Dream Focus was still wrong to revert me. FreeKnowledgeCreator (talk) 22:18, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
- Keep the conversation in one place please. Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Books#should_infobox_contain_the_month_as_well_as_the_year_something_was_published.3F. There was no agreement to do this, just a small number of people saying something, and since then more people saying something against it. Dream Focus 14:10, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Dragons of Summer Flame. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090816190124/http://www.audiobooksonline.com:80/155935206X.html to http://www.audiobooksonline.com/155935206X.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:14, 16 December 2016 (UTC)
- Start-Class novel articles
- Low-importance novel articles
- Start-Class Fantasy fiction articles
- Unknown-importance Fantasy fiction articles
- WikiProject Novels articles
- Start-Class Dungeons & Dragons articles
- Low-importance Dungeons & Dragons articles
- Start-Class Dungeons & Dragons articles of Low-importance
- All Dungeons & Dragons articles