Talk:Dunstable Downs

Bedfordshire High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bedfordshire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bedfordshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BedfordshireWikipedia:WikiProject BedfordshireTemplate:WikiProject BedfordshireBedfordshire articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	The infobox box status of this article has been marked as: Complete

UK geography Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Rename

This article was recently moved from "Dunstable Downs" to "Dunstable and Whipsnade Downs" because that is "the official title, listed by English Nature as a Site of Scientific Interest". However, this ignores the general Wikipedia policy on names which is to use the common name rather than an official name.

But first it is necessary to decide what this article is about. Is it about the hill that attracts lots of visitors, which even the National Trust calls "Dunstable Downs", and which happens to be part of an SSSI? Or is it about the SSSI called "Dunstable and Whipsnade Downs"? In the latter case, the article should be clearer about what makes it interesting to scientists (I guess it is the flowers and butterflies), as well as saying it is a popular destination, etc.

In any case it may be desirable to check exactly what area is covered by the SSSI designation. JonH (talk) 16:57, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[Copied from User talk:JonH] Hi there, I've just read your comments at Dunstable and Whipsnade Downs and I must admit I've probably made a right royal cock up. To be honest I would support an article that would incorporate that that it's both a National Trust managed area and a SSSI, otherwise we would end up with two articles broadly saying the same thing. Info as to why the area is a SSSI can be easily obtained, from English Nature and added (you're right, it's the flowers and butterflies!). As for the actual article name, well I'm not sure who has the most clout the NT or English Nature so perhaps this is an article for WP:COMMONNAME. Incidentally the NT lists it as Dunstable Downs and Whipsnade Estate. However as an alternative, you could name it Dunstable Downs and have the full title in the intro like this school near me. What do you think? Regards --Starrycupz (talk) 22:19, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Don't worry, it's not a big disaster that cannot be fixed. I would suggest moving it back to "Dunstable Downs", but I also respect other people's opinions. Google gives the following numbers of hits: "Dunstable Downs" 32000, "Whipsnade Downs" 439, "Dunstable and Whipsnade Downs" 89. If there is one combined article, it should still tell readers the full name used by the National Trust for its estate and the the full name used by English Nature for the SSSI (and in the title of the SSSI infobox I suggest including the word "SSSI" so that readers know what the acreage refers to). This map on the government MAGIC site shows the SSSI as two long thin green areas: one is what I think of as Dunstable Downs, and the other stretches into Whipsnade Zoo. JonH (talk) 18:37, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Dunstable Downs. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070711231258/http://www.galaxy.bedfordshire.gov.uk:80/webingres/bedfordshire/vlib/0.yoyo/yyc_facts_geography.htm to http://www.galaxy.bedfordshire.gov.uk/webingres/bedfordshire/vlib/0.yoyo/yyc_facts_geography.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 23:14, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

National Trust pilot

Hello! During late June, July and some of August, I'm working on a paid project sponsored by the National Trust to review and enahnce coverage of NT sites. You can find the project edits here, as well as a statement and contact details for the National Trust. I am leaving this message when I make a first edit to a page; please do get in touch if you have any concerns. Lajmmoore (talk) 20:30, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]