Talk:Dvir Abramovich
Appearance
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Someone having a personal feud with a Living Person doesn't belong on wikipedia
[edit]Hyping a personal feud not as part of some general controversy, but a series of personal attacks shouldn't have its own category on the wikipedia page of the person having a one way feud. 103.217.167.180 (talk) 23:44, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
2020 Cleanup notes
[edit]General cleanup on this page sought to better structure the paragraphs and to remove undue material (long quotes not entirely relevant or useful). I.am.a.qwerty (talk) 09:35, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
2020 Cleanup part 2: Criticism section
[edit]Criticism section was initially deleted by me as it seems to violate WP Undue and POV, but as a second editor re-added the section, I will address these two points and have added section tags to alert the reader to the issues.
- Undue/pov - my issue is the undue weight given to political opposition to the article subject without context of support from the subject's community or from the broader society. Also, Two of the publications may not meet WP reliability standards. I.am.a.qwerty (talk) 09:42, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
- Knowing the subject matter personally, the criticisms are far more widespread and come from every corner of the community. That cannot be backed up with sources, and therefore should not be in the article, but I think the without some acknowledgement of the criticism he faces the article would be incomplete. If you feel that there is undue weight I have no objections to pulling the section and moving it into another existing section. The POV is not necessary since the text as written specifically points out that it is a POV. Playlet (talk) 14:50, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
Categories:
- Biography articles of living people
- Start-Class biography articles
- Start-Class biography (science and academia) articles
- Unknown-importance biography (science and academia) articles
- Science and academia work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- Start-Class Australia articles
- Low-importance Australia articles
- WikiProject Australia articles