Talk:Dylan and Cole Sprouse/GA2

GA Reassessment

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS):
The prose is clear and concise, respects copyright laws, and the spelling and grammar are correct, this article complies with Wikipedia's Manual of Style.
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
See notes below. The sources here are fine (But I have doubts to "Gossip Center.com") and this contains no original research.
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
See notes below. This article is quite focused on the subject.
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It all seemed preety fair to me.
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
I can see that the page is stable.
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
All the images are tagged and there are no non-free images, see notes below for point b.
Overall:
Pass/Fail:
– Plarem ^{(User talk contribs)} 14:58, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

For point Number six, the note is that the current picture of them could be a bit newer, but that is only a proposition.
The end of Dylan and Cole Sprouse#Acting may leave the reader wanting more, as to what are they doing now, because this ends at 2010.
I will leave a citation needed tag where references are needed. (^{[citation needed]})

FAIL – I have assessed the article and left recommendations, but noone can find what are they doint now and find the citations that are needed in 5 days. I am sorry to say that I have failed this article, Tough luck lads... – Plarem ^{(User talk contribs)} 15:21, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]