Talk:EHP spectral sequence

Notation

(I'm not a topologist.) To me, the notation S^n(2) seems to be unfortunate. After all, it is not the space which is localised (?), but only the homotopy group. So one should explain what kind of "fibration" gives a long exact sequence only for the localizations of the homotopy groups. Jakob.scholbach 21:21, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It is indeed the space that is localized. R.e.b. 17:44, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I was under the impression that EHP computes unstable stems. Look a the title of Mahowald's article. I am not confident enough to change it, but i will in a bit unless someone convinces me it is in fact stable. also, the notation is not proper for the localization, it should be a subscript in parentheses. It is also the case that it is in general a bad form of notation because it really means do thus and such for everything BUT 2 or p if you will. Sean Tilson 2:23, 26 December 2007 (UTC)

Referencing

Struggle street...? What is this??? "It is described in more detail in Ravenel (2003, chapter 1.5) and Mahowald (2001)." What is that? Seedy inline referencing belongs in lefty essays on climate change not wikipedia! Reference properly! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.167.65.79 (talk) 00:19, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]