Talk:Edmonds Band Rotunda

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Historic sites

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Historic sites, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of historic sites on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Historic sitesWikipedia:WikiProject Historic sitesTemplate:WikiProject Historic sitesHistoric sites articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

New Zealand Low‑importance

	New Zealand portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A fact from Edmonds Band Rotunda appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 2 November 2024 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the basement of the Edmonds Band Rotunda (pictured) was once used as a kitchen?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2024/November. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Edmonds Band Rotunda.

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Kimikel talk 00:46, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

Edmonds Band Rotunda

... that Edmonds Band Rotunda (pictured) was deconstructed after the 2011 Christchurch earthquake and was rebuilt in 2021?

Source: https://www.odt.co.nz/star-news/star-christchurch/thomas-edmonds-band-rotunda-restoration-historic-riverside-landmark

Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Dezik and Tsygan

Created by Panamitsu (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 48 past nominations.

―Panamitsu (talk) 07:50, 30 August 2024 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
Freely licensed: Used in article: Clear at 100px:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: A bit uninteresting, but looks good. 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 14:17, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nice article, I found the fact it was a restaurant to be quite interesting/unique, heritage buildings often get rebuilt but a rotunda serving as a restaurant paints quite an interesting thought in my mind. Traumnovelle (talk) 07:06, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Seconding Traumnovelle, my only comment is that the hook is a bit boring. I think a more interesting one might be something like ...that the small basement of the Edmonds Band Rotunda was once used as a kitchen?. And thank you for including my photo! David Palmer//cloventt ^(talk) 20:35, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This looks more interesting than the hook presented in the nomination. 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 11:44, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that your hook is better, Cloventt. I'll write it out for the next reviewer. ALT1:

"... that the small basement of the Edmonds Band Rotunda (pictured) was once used as a kitchen?" Source: https://canterburystories.nz/exhibitions/places-christchurch-band-rotundas/thomas-edmonds-band-rotunda ―Panamitsu (talk) 06:31, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tagging for a second review, given Nuggeteer's topic ban. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:25, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I was going to approve the new hook, but there are some issues: 1. the sentence supporting the fact lacks a footnote, 2. the source does not refer to the basement as "small", and 3. the article is in need of a copyedit for some minor grammatical errors. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 02:18, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the review, Narutolovehinata5. I've added a citation to the end of the sentence supporting the hook, and have done some copyedits on the article. Here is ALT2, without the "small":

"... that the basement of the Edmonds Band Rotunda (pictured) was once used as a kitchen?"

Cheers ―Panamitsu (talk) 04:16, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, this should be good to go. Given the original reviewer's topic ban I did a second check of the article, as well as a check of the QPQ. @Panamitsu: I have to note that with your provided QPQ, you neglected to mention that nomination's QPQ in the review, but given that was the only thing missing and the article was still checked otherwise, I'll let it slide, with a reminder to mention a QPQ's need or if it was done in future reviewers. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 08:17, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]