Jump to content

Talk:Edward Pakenham

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

File:Pakenham.gif Nominated for speedy Deletion

[edit]

An image used in this article, File:Pakenham.gif, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Pakenham.gif)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 22:17, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Book and inverntion

[edit]

Captain Pakenham's invention of a substitute for a lost rudder, and to prevent its being lost. Also a method of restoring the masts of ships, when wounded, or otherwise injured

All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 22:36, 4 November 2015 (UTC).[reply]

Assessment comment

[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Edward Pakenham/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Stub - probably enough information out there from other sources to move up to start class. Add infobox and some structure in the form of sections would help. Use footnotes to cite sources so each reference matches up with the facts given. Aboutmovies 20:32, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 20:32, 24 February 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 14:11, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Pakenham's plan of attack

[edit]

Blogs, for the most part, are not seen as RS, but the following text resonated with me.

Surprisingly, the British were actually the ones facing the long odds at New Orleans. In a way, their assault on Chalmette Plantation was like their attack on Arnhem in World War II. They took an immense gamble and needed everything to go right, when, as things happened, everything went wrong. A carefully woven battle plan dissolved into a comedy of errors that played out in front of massed cannon and furious small-arms fire.

"The Battle of New Orleans: The Myths that Made a Nation". Deliberations at Mimir's Well. 21 November 2017. Keith H99 (talk) 10:22, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]