Jump to content

Talk:Electronic identification

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Examples in separate sections

[edit]

example belgium (eid) + estonia (eid) ;)83.134.210.39 (talk) 12:12, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I modified the article so that the definition of eID is kept universal, while the details pertaining to the Belgian eID are kept under a heading "Belgium". This leaves room for the presentation of the eID employed in other countries (Estonia, Italy and the Netherlands come to mind right now). The incentive to make this change was the need to reference the term eID in an article about Estonia, which, I believe, should not direct the visitor to the Belgian eID page. However, I would appreciate receiving comments on this. Rentzepopoulos (talk) 09:01, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious mentioning of the Dutch DigiD

[edit]

In the section "Netherlands" the article states: The Netherlands has an electronic ID called DigiD. That may be true in itself, but it is a dubious statement in the context of this article, because DigiD is not an electronic identity card, but merely a unified login for governmental and other official web sites. According to Dutch wikipedia (article nl:Identiteitskaart the Dutch identity card is a contactless smart card since 2006, but it is simply called Identiteitskaart (Identity card), not DigiD. I've just scrutinized mine and indeed, it seems to have a chip embedded near the upper right corner. Still trying to find more information on line, I'm planning to update the article accordingly. Jahoe (talk) 23:41, 9 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Electronic identification. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:56, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Electronic identification. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:11, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

eIC not defined

[edit]

In the first paragraph the article suddenly mentions "eIC" besides "eID". It is however not further defined and it is unclear if this is just a typo or a different instrument or technology. This should be clarified further.