Talk:Endeca
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Endeca article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Buzzwords & Advertising
[edit]User:Galloping Moses was correct to label this page for attention. Terms like deploy, "services work", and "the many types of Endeca solutions" may be meaningful to Endeca customers, but do not advance the understanding of the general reader to whom Wikipedia's encyclopedic content is aimed. The extensive use of capital letters in this article on words that are not proper nouns is also problematic. Please try to explain the company and its products and services in a neutral way, and cite sources. Please do not simply revert the tags because you disagree with them; that is vandalism. Start a discussion here if you feel they are misplaced on this article. --Cantabwarrior (talk) 23:22, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
I agree that the entry should be improved, but I think that the previous version by User:Endeca was better than the current one. I understand insisting on the tags until the language is more encylopedic, but why revert the substantive edits? Dtunkelang (talk) 02:31, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
- The contributions by User:Endeca may have been substantial, but they were also entirely unsourced, unverifiable from reliable sources, and from someone with a conflict of interest. If you are able to improve the article by using edits as a basis for an article with a neutral point of view with verifiable and sourced information, please be bold and fix it. The article needs your help. --Cantabwarrior (talk) 01:17, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
- I decided to be bold as you suggested. I encourage you and others to make incremental improvement. Also, I want to disclose clearly that I am a former Endeca employee. Dtunkelang (talk) 02:38, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
- Thank you! Your edits are a great contribution. --Cantabwarrior (talk) 03:33, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
Staffworx Ltd in UK are a good Endeca recruiter, see them on www.staffworx.co.uk — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.178.142.186 (talk) 20:56, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
- I've deleted your spam and will report you in the chat room when I get a moment 213.122.174.85 (talk) 09:41, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
- Start-Class Computing articles
- Low-importance Computing articles
- Start-Class software articles
- Unknown-importance software articles
- Start-Class software articles of Unknown-importance
- All Software articles
- All Computing articles
- Start-Class company articles
- Low-importance company articles
- WikiProject Companies articles