Talk:Eparchies of the Georgian Orthodox Church
Appearance
![]() | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
??
[edit]What was the problem with this edit? Alæxis¿question? 19:33, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
- The problem is that you put this f***en politics into everything. This is just a list of the Georgian Orthodox eparchies. The problems associated with each of them will be discussed in the corresponding articles. --KoberTalk 19:44, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
- As the things stand now the reader is suggested that the Tskhum-Apkhazeti eparchy doesn't differ in any way from other eparchies, New Athos Monastery and others are ruled by the Georgian Orthodox Church and so on. I think that some kind of a remark is needed to let the reader know of the controversies around this issue. Alæxis¿question? 04:59, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
- This is the list regarded as canonical by the Orthodox Christian world. Any further additions are redundant here. The beauty of Wikipedia is that one can easily follow the link to the (upcoming) Tskhum-Apkhazeti eparchy article and quickly learn what is really going on there. So, please be so kind to leave this page undisturbed. I'm already getting a bit nostalgic for a brief but prolific summer period when I was able to create an article or two per day without being stalked and locked in absolutely unproductive discussions. Kind regards, --KoberTalk 05:17, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
- I also enjoyed that period very much )))
- I'm still convinced that situation on the ground should be mentioned and will think about how to incorporate it here. Alæxis¿question? 08:00, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
- This is the list regarded as canonical by the Orthodox Christian world. Any further additions are redundant here. The beauty of Wikipedia is that one can easily follow the link to the (upcoming) Tskhum-Apkhazeti eparchy article and quickly learn what is really going on there. So, please be so kind to leave this page undisturbed. I'm already getting a bit nostalgic for a brief but prolific summer period when I was able to create an article or two per day without being stalked and locked in absolutely unproductive discussions. Kind regards, --KoberTalk 05:17, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
What about asking for a third opinion or rfc over this issue? Alæxis¿question? 15:11, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
- Alaexis, there's no need for a third-party intervention whenever you fail to push a pro-separatist POV. There're plenty of other pages you can satisfy your urge to promote an anti-Georgian agenda. This is a list of Georgian Orthodox eparchies, and as a practicing Georgian Orthodox Christian, I feel nauseated by your efforts to politicize this page. On the other hand, I will think of requesting a formal intervention due to your stalking behavior which disturbs me.--KoberTalk 15:59, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
- You may do it any time. Considering your recent edits of the Marat Kulakhmetov article you'd have pretty strong position...
- ps. What pages have you written about? Are there really pages I don't know of where I "can satisfy [my] urge to promote an anti-Georgian agenda"? ))) Alæxis¿question? 16:17, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
- Marat Kulakhmetov has been on my watchlist since the author created it. FYI, there's a user-generated bot that uses keywords including "Abkhazia" and "South Ossetia" to find and announce Georgia-related articles most of which then appears on my watchlist. So, please don't make false assumptions and accusations. As for your P.S., I would strongly suggest keeping your irony to yourself and your fellow agit-prop activists. --KoberTalk 16:27, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
“ | There're plenty of other pages you can satisfy your urge to promote an anti-Georgian agenda. | ” |
- Was that ironic or serious? Anyway, I suggest you to apply the same standards to yourself also then. Alæxis¿question? 16:40, 25 August 2007 (UTC)