Talk:Erschallet, ihr Lieder, erklinget, ihr Saiten! BWV 172/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Dr. Blofeld (talk · contribs) 19:29, 8 January 2014 (UTC)

Will review within 72 hours.♦ Dr. Blofeld 19:29, 8 January 2014 (UTC)

• Wondering why Thomaskantor and Konzertmeister are italicized. I gather this is the convention in your articles but I was wondering why?

• I understand that all foreign language terms should be italicized. I don't do it for things in quotation marks, such as the titles of hymns, but the titles (first lines) of the movements.

• "Christoph Wolff suggests that Bach may have studied in Weimar musical settings available in the court library" do you mean books about musical settings?

• No, musical scores, if I understand the source right.

• Delink second instance of Gospel of John per OVERLINK.

• Done. However, the links to verses will always be blue.

• In scoring you use words for number but use "movement 5", was this intentional? Ideally they should be consistent of course!

• I looked at it and hope I consistently use now "first" and "second" as words, but "movement 5".

• Any reason why F major isn't linked in the table and C and A minor are? I'd link it there and remove the links to A minor and F underneath in the text.

• Only reason: the table was created the latest ;) - done as you said.

• Can you add a few citations to the recordings section? Ideally the red links should be filled too ;-]

• all Bach cantatas, ref added, - I know someone who fills red links ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:06, 8 January 2014 (UTC)

• Done so far, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:17, 8 January 2014 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

Good job, looks adequate for GA.♦ Dr. Blofeld 21:48, 8 January 2014 (UTC)

Sounds good, thank you! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:58, 8 January 2014 (UTC)