Talk:Esther Drummond

Esther Drummond has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
October 28, 2012	Good article nominee	Listed

Doctor Who: Torchwood High‑importance

	Doctor Who portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Doctor Who, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Doctor Who and its spin-offs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this notice, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Doctor WhoWikipedia:WikiProject Doctor WhoTemplate:WikiProject Doctor WhoDoctor Who articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Torchwood task force.

Fictional characters

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles

Science Fiction Low‑importance

	Speculative fiction portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Fiction, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science fiction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science FictionWikipedia:WikiProject Science FictionTemplate:WikiProject Science Fictionscience fiction articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Television Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Esther Drummond/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: GAtechnical (talk · contribs) 13:48, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
Bits to improve
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
provide a caption for the image e.g. what episode is that from.
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

Section 1

Lead: new co-production. I think new is a bit out of date

I have amended this. Eshlare (talk) 17:32, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Response to the character varied. Some critics praised her characterisation and portrayal. Should run into one.

I have altered this. Eshlare (talk) 17:32, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Apperences: Drummond, a CIA watch. CIA needs to be in full and linked and then (CIA) in brackets as you mention it again. single word "Torchwood", and when Rex is fatally injured, Esther blames herself for his accident. Full stop new sentence after torchwood.

Harkness explains the history of the Torchwood Institute to Esther, but wipes her memory so she will not remember her findings. Should it be wiped her memories of their encounter.

Esther is forced to effectively kill camp manager Colin Maloney (Marc Vann) in unarmed combat to rescue Rex. How was she forced she was fighting for her life and didn't she break his neck. so paralyised instead of effectivly killed.

In "Immortal Sins", Esther is the one to work out that Gwen is being blackmailed into delivering Jack to the conspirators behind Miracle Day; Should be Esther works out that. Saves a few words.

What did Esther do/happen to her in the novel

I have tried to clarify most plot details whilst remaining concise. Eshlare (talk) 17:32, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Reception link Sarah and link Hevins Phifer full name and link if possible if not state the media they work for.

Havins and Phifer are actors involved with the series and have their names linked earlier in the prose. Eshlare (talk) 17:32, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

io9 should be itallics

I believe only print sources should be in italics? Eshlare (talk) 17:32, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

2 bits a bit confused on how was Jack captured and she wasn't. Who instgated the resuce what did Esther play.

Then shouldn't it be Esther transfuses Jack's blood into Rex and is shot trying to protect him by the family?

Think I've done my best with everything. It's been a while since I've edited this article so I'm not so familiar with it. Thanks for the review. Eshlare (talk) 17:32, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Righty after improvements from you and a copy edit from me I think we have a complete article. Well done I'm promoting this to GA standard. GAtechnical (talk) 21:15, 28 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Esther Drummond. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:51, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Esther Drummond. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:22, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]