Talk:Etzel Cardeña

This article was nominated for deletion on 2 September 2018. The result of the discussion was keep.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

Psychology

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Skepticism Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sweden Low‑importance

	Sweden portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sweden, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sweden-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwedenWikipedia:WikiProject SwedenTemplate:WikiProject SwedenSweden articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Etzel Cardeña. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110930214511/http://www.salongk.se/artiklar/import/2006/9/7/4470/index.xml to http://www.salongk.se/artiklar/import/2006/9/7/4470/index.xml

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 04:48, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

POV

The claim in this article is that ESP is being proven using science. Really? News to me. RobP (talk) 12:38, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

edit notes

Improved the article somewhat by removing uncited and 'not noteable' material, still needs more and better citations. The discussion to delete is still very relevant IMO. Without proving the existence of and hopefully citing RS (that aren't just broken links) it is difficult for me to justify keeping this article on the grounds of notability. Endercase (talk) 16:08, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Due to the reversion of my edit without discussion on the talk page I have weighed in at the deletion !vote about the article. Endercase (talk)

I don't think you can have tried very hard to cite any of this material before just removing it. I have added citations for most of it. —David Eppstein (talk) 19:24, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

WP:FRINGE

The article gives weight to Cardeña's fringe "expressed views" but omits any mainstream reception, analysis, or context. As a WP:FRINGEBLP, we could apply sources such as Arthur S. Reber and James E. Alcock as well as Steven Novella per WP:PARITY. - LuckyLouie (talk) 13:33, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]