Talk:Feudal barony of Barnstaple

Military history: British / European / Medieval C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	Medieval warfare task force (c. 500 – c. 1500)

Middle Ages Low‑importance

	Middle Ages portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Devon Low‑importance

	Devon portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Devon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Devon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DevonWikipedia:WikiProject DevonTemplate:WikiProject DevonDevon articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

What happened to the barony after James Audley?

I was wondering this before you demerged the article from Barnstaple. Did it get split up into smaller and smaller pieces, or was it abolished, or what? —SMALL JIM 11:31, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Don't know. Sanders's descents end in 1327, a date he deems as marking the end of the true feudal age. I've certainly been wondering that myself. Perhaps you might like to look into it? (Lobsterthermidor (talk) 17:22, 24 August 2012 (UTC))[reply]

There are some articles in old volumes of the Transactions of the Devonshire Association that look promising - I'll check. Is there nothing in Lamplugh? —SMALL JIM 10:12, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Using two TDA articles, I've brought it down to 1509 (death of Margaret). A related question: is a feudal barony the same as an Honour (feudal barony)? Barnstaple is listed in that article and if they are the same thing, I wonder if this article should be renamed Honour of Barnstaple? What do you think? —SMALL JIM 16:18, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Only probable

I see from English feudal barony that Sanders listed this as only a "probable" barony. Does this have any significance for this article? —SMALL JIM 15:11, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I think we can take it that if Sanders deems it "probable" there is very little doubt indeed. He discusses his criteria for inclusion in his intro. There are many more he excluded, but Barnstaple is a big player in this field & although size is not a criterion of itself, he states that de Tracy answered for 56 knight's fees (i.e. sub-manors he held) in 1235. In fact reading Sanders's footnotes for Barnstaple he actually quotes: "Geoffrey de Camville held Maud's lands by service of a barony...", he seems to have been scrupulously over-cautious in not deeming it a certain barony, but any records of payments of feudal relief, the clinching factor he set himself, have not apparently survived. (Lobsterthermidor (talk) 17:43, 24 August 2012 (UTC))[reply]

Sounds good to me then! But I still wonder if Honour of Barnstaple might be a better title. —SMALL JIM 13:51, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]