Talk:Fitna

This article was nominated for deletion on 26 June 2021. The result of the discussion was speedy keep.

Warning box

I believe that the warning about the movie should not be on this disambiguation page. Regardless of what Mr. Wilders thinks his "official" website is, only the page on Wikipedia that discusses the movie itself should contain this warning. I'll leave it to someone more senior than me to get rid of this again...Alg8662 (talk) 02:55, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The goal of this warning is to avoid confusion. The confusion should immediately be removed on the moment people go to the mentioned link. If people go to that link, they come on the attached page to this talkpage. Therefore, the warning should be on Fitna, where the link is pointing to, as that is the page mentioned as "official website" (which statement is of course ridiculous, I think nobody disagrees on that). effeietsanders 10:35, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, if the warning is taken off the page for "Fitna (film)", then that's fair - I agree. Thanks. 140.180.12.158 (talk) 23:05, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Agree, Wikipedia has a general disclaimer, no special disclaimer needed on this page. Kelly ^hi! 23:09, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've restored the disclaimer -- the supposed general disclaimer is mute on such a case as this. It is in the interests of Wikipedia readers to dispel misconceptions regarding the URL. older ≠ wiser 01:35, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Agree with the removal. Unnecessary warning, see also Wikipedia:Self-references to avoid. Garion96 (talk) 01:43, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There should not be a link to any site hosting the film on this page

For several reasons, there should NOT be a link to any site hosting the film on this page:

The disclaimer box at the top of the page (which I think should stay), says Wikipedia is not associated with the film. Having a link counteracts what the disclaimer box says.
It is Wikipedia policy that disclaimer pages have a very simple and fixed structure. For example, the standard says there should be max 1 link per line. See here - it specifically says "Never include external links".
Pointing at any particular web site hosting the film is an implied recommendation of that site. Not Wikipedia's job.
Pointing at any particular web site is dodgy, as the site could go down or change its content or misuse its newfound fame to flood the user's PC with unwanted material, or who knows what. Not something Wikipedia should let itself be vulnerable to.
Probably several other reasons too, but the above should be enough.

--RenniePet (talk) 10:38, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This page should indeed not contain a link to the movie. The Fitna (film) article already has one anyway. - Face 12:46, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disclaimer

This page does not need a special disclaimer - see Wikipedia:General disclaimer. Kelly ^hi! 01:43, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What happened to the article on the film?

Why did Wikipedia take the article on the film down? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.125.177.144 (talk) 12:58, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It can be found at Fitna (film). StaticGull Talk 13:00, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please pay attention to numerous articles which interlinks to Fitna as an expression. You can't move it so easily.--Seyyed(t-c) 18:09, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]