Talk:Focus phrase

NPOV tag

Can we please remove this flag as the information has now been updated to reflect proper policies....Thank you Spiritspeak1 (talk) 23:49, 23 April 2011 (UTC)

I have refreshed the tag. The article is very wishy-washy and for an article on a scientific topic it has far too few sources. Unless more can be found, the article should either be cut down substantially or merged with another.   Will Beback  talk  02:06, 31 August 2011 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Focus phrase. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20060925030141/http://staff.science.uva.nl/~pdekker/Only/Statements/Bende-Farkas.txt to http://staff.science.uva.nl/~pdekker/Only/Statements/Bende-Farkas.txt

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 09:26, 17 January 2016 (UTC)