Jump to content

Talk:For Your Eyes Only (song)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Fair use rationale for Image:Easton-fyeocover.JPG

[edit]

Image:Easton-fyeocover.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 07:15, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Blondie story

[edit]

There actually seem to be no first- or second-hand sources for the story about Blondie. However, it does appear in other Wikipedia articles, and it is plausible. However, I think it needs to be simplified a little, since we don't know, for example, if the producers actively disliked Blondie's song. Timothy Horrigan (talk) 18:29, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Movie music in the Top 40

[edit]

I may be totally wrong but I recall at the time that it was amazing that the title music from a (non-musical) movie was in the Top 40. I.e. it was one of the first steps in the direction of media-tie-ins that has become commonplace now. Should this be mentioned? Nevster (talk) 01:35, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]