Talk:Forrest's pika/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Wilhelmina Will (talk · contribs) 05:19, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

GA criteria

Well-written:

With a number of grammatical tweaks, the article complies with grammar as well as general layout policies. While you're doing that... (talk) 08:10, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

(a) the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct

(b) it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation

Verifiable with no original research:

The article makes frequent use of each of a number of reputable sources, and does not appear to contain any original research. While you're doing that... (talk) 08:09, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

(a) it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline

(b) reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose)

(c) it contains no original research

Broad in its coverage:

The article adequately covers all the standard areas of its topic. While you're doing that... (talk) 08:07, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

(a) it addresses the main aspects of the topic

(b) it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style)

Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.

The article discusses its topic in a completely unbiased manner. While you're doing that... (talk) 08:06, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.

The article has not suffered any disruptive editing since 2008, according to the revision history. While you're doing that... (talk) 20:17, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:

The sole image used in the article at present is freely licensed, and serves a relevant illustrative purpose by visually conveying the species' habitat range. While you're doing that... (talk) 20:10, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

(a) media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content

(b) media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions

The article meets the GA criteria, and is passed. Congratulations! While you're doing that... (talk) 08:10, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]