Jump to content

Talk:Foundation for a Drug-Free World

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

Their site lists lots of inaccurate and untrue things, not that i like illegal drugs or anything but it's blatant misinformation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.45.160.38 (talk) 23:38, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Bias

[edit]

This article needs more work to:

  • substantiate the claims made (unscientific, misleading)
  • use more neutral language
  • maintain a neutral POV
  • find better quality sources (some are newsblogs and primary sources)
  • fill out an actual history of the group (who founded it, when, and where)

We don't get to violate NPOV just because we're discussing the Scientologists. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 00:33, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

United Nations "partnered"

[edit]

Scientology is notorious for coat-tailing on United Nations calendar dates. Other than a Scientology press release in a community newspaper, are there any WP:RS sources that say that the United Nations was even aware of the event, never mind "partnered"? 199.119.233.133 (talk) 05:59, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I agree and tagged the statement. If the UN did partner there would be some statement from the UN about it, not only a mention in a local newspaper that most likely got its information from the subject of the article. Sjö (talk) 06:33, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I am removing this absurd claim, it's not mentioned anywhere by the UN and there is no alternative Reliable Source. Mramoeba (talk) 13:04, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This seems to be what they're referring to. Gmarmstrong (talk) 23:25, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring

[edit]

Wikipedia relies on the use on secondary reliable sources. If you are in any doubt what constitutes a primary source have a look here: sources. Also please familiarise yourself with what we mean by 'reliable' and editing with a neutral point of view. @Neutroinfo: If these are your first edits as suggested by your history I would suggest editing some less contentious topics, maybe trying The Wikipedia Adventure and If you have any questions please feel free to ask in the Wikipedia:Teahouse Thanks.

I have copied this from talk page as It occurred to me perhaps the user is unfamiliar with where messages can be found. Mramoeba (talk) 10:20, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]