Talk:Fox Armoured Car
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Fox Armoured Car article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||
|
Name
[edit]I reverted the name, because "Fox Armoured Car" is the vehicles name otherwise it could have been Fox (armoured car) etc GraemeLeggett 08:54, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- I forget to add to also compare with AEC Armoured Car etc. GraemeLeggett
- But are the words "Armoured Car" part of the formal name or official designation? I see your point, but I think "Fox armoured car" is perfectly acceptable as a name, with only the title "Fox" being a proper noun. —Michael Z. 2005-06-21 19:02 Z
- So far as I can tell, yes. Though it might have been Car, Armoured, Reconnaisannce, Fox knowing the British Commonwealth way of naming things. Give me a little while longer to confirm. GraemeLeggett 19:11, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Dead Links
[edit]The bottom two links are dead — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:44B8:215F:2B00:1D32:FA05:5E1:558 (talk) 13:43, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
Categories:
- Start-Class military history articles
- Start-Class military land vehicles articles
- Military land vehicles task force articles
- Start-Class military science, technology, and theory articles
- Military science, technology, and theory task force articles
- Start-Class weaponry articles
- Weaponry task force articles
- Start-Class Canadian military history articles
- Canadian military history task force articles
- Start-Class North American military history articles
- North American military history task force articles
- Start-Class World War II articles
- World War II task force articles