A request has been made for this article to be peer reviewed to receive a broader perspective on how it may be improved. Please make any edits you see fit to improve the quality of this article.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject European history, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the history of Europe on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European historyWikipedia:WikiProject European historyTemplate:WikiProject European historyEuropean history articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: Thank you for this article. Please state your opinion on the French Wikipedia article at fr:François-Louis Auvity. Could that be article be used to expand the English Wikipedia article?
I answered this question unambiguously on my page, and I'm reproducing my reply here, so that everyone be aware of the deception going on on the French page: CERTAINLY NOT, it would rather be the opposite, insofar as THIS article, in English, is 100 percent objective and reliable, while the article in French was visibly biased, in January 2020 and again in January 2023, by an admirer of Auvity and an apologist for the Nazi clergy in occupied France. Mémoiredumaquis (talk) 11:44, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
