Talk:GÖKTUĞ

Military history: Aviation / Technology / Weaponry / European / Middle East Start‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force
	European military history task force
	Middle Eastern military history task force

Article is written like an advert

In my humble opinion, this article is written more like an advertisement than an actual subjective, neutral and informative one. Please review it. --Ddkatsios (talk) 13:14, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ddkatsios. If you think it's advert like then be more specific. I looked and I can't really see how it's an advert. Making a comment here with no replies indicates that others didn't see the comment or they did but don't agree. There have been several editors to the article and none of them seemed to think it an advert. Did you discuss this with Arado first? Why didn't you use {{advert}} on the article? You could have sent it to deletion if it was really a major problem. However, moving it to draft isn't going to fix anything. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 09:23, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

R