Talk:Galactik Football/Archive old

Old

I have corrected the spelling, in most of the cases(having seen the show in Hungarian, and knowing the recklessness of translators, I can't retrace the opening theme's original text), and reworded the article in some places, though it may still require cleanup, so I left the tag. --ThunderBird 10:15, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

Thanks, ThunderBird, much obliged.T-borg 11:26, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

Hey, who removed the opening theme section? Other articles have such, you know.T-borg 10:30, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

I will add an info box but will leave the things blank as i dont know alot of info about the program

You're not the only one. Try searching for Galactik Football on TV.com or IMDb and you'll get nothen'.T-borg 14:19, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

I watch gmatch Galactik Football so i know most match results- hawes78

You know you just have to type at least 4 tildes (~~~~) to sign posts, don't you? ;)T-borg 21:35, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

Hope they make a game of this xD

Hey uhm there's still much needed to be done in this article... for instance, the matches final outcome, do you really think that that's necessary to put here on wikipedia?? And a lot of spelling isn't ok... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.46.215.202 (talk) 20:17, 29 June 2008 (UTC)

Characters section

I will try to post one as soon as possible, here's the general look:

Characters

Protagonists

• D'Jok:
• Rocket:
• Tia:
• Micro-Ice:
• Thran:
• Mei:
• Ahito:
• Aarch:
• Clamp:
• Dame Simbai:
• Norata:
• Brim Simbra:
• Callie Mystie:
• Nork Agnet:

Antagonists

• Artegor Nexus:
• Gen. Bleylock:
• Sinedd:

Opponents

• Cyclopses:
• Lightnings:
• Pirates:
• Rykers:
• Shadows:
• Technoids:
• Red Tigers:
• Wambas:

so, what do you think?T-borg 17:47, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

Edits

To T-Borg: The character section looks great, except for one thing.. You've labeled Narata as an antagonist. He's not really an antagonist since he isn't against the team specifically. Just his son playing on the akillian team which he eventually allows. You also see that in the end he supports Rocket and all. It's better if you put him in the protagonist section or create a neutral section and add him there. The neutral section could also include the pirates (besides Blackbones as he staunchly supports his son (D'jokk) and others. Also don't you think it's time to merge all those other sections such as the plot, The Snow Kids, The Flux, etc. I'd do it myself but I don't know how. Hopefully I'll update the episode list/summary soon and you can merge that in as well. Thanks, good luck and good work. 203.81.216.47 17:07, 23 March 2007 (UTC)Pitch Black

Thanks, but I wrote that when the series had just begun. I agree there's a lot of work to be done here, but I'm a bit preoccupied at the moment. Soon I'll have enough time though, so this all will be fixed, I assure you. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T-borg) ^{(drop me a line)} 18:35, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

animated picture

This image distracts, at least me, from the text. All unstatic elements of websites do. I encourage to select something static instead. 88.156.82.220 (talk) 11:46, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

Agree. I came here via random wanderings, and immediately wanted to shut down my browser. Yngvarr (c) 21:51, 8 July 2008 (UTC)

It was the best image I could find at the time. I'm still searching for a better one, preferably of the show's logo or a group pic of the main characters, the Snow Kids. Recently I believe I've come across a suitable image, so I'll upload it as soon as I can, and we'll see if it's better. Any suggestions would be appreciated. —T-borg (T | C) 04:12, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

If there is a title card for the show, I'd use that in the infobox. Then you can un-animate the image, break it down into separate images of the kids, and place them either on the main The Snow Kids (Galactik Football) characters list, or put their respective images into the character specific article (i.e., D'Jok (Galactik Football)). Yngvarr (c) 09:32, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

Better? —T-borg (T | C) 09:24, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

Both are fien to me the original and that oen but you will need to get anotehr one as that is techincally copyrighted that picture to jetix. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Andrewcrawford (talk • contribs) 05:27, July 10, 2008

Any image is going to be copyrighted, which is why the non-free rational template is used. But, to answer the question, yes. Yngvarr (t) (c) 09:31, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

Not exactely true, image taking froma tv broadcast is copyrighted and is violation of wikipedia rules, where as something created by another user is not as then the copyright belongs to them.--Andrewcrawford (talk) 09:38, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

No, I suggest you do a little more research into copyright. Taking a picture of a copyrighted image does not mean you own the content of that picture. It is the image, regardless of medium, which is copyrighted. Try to go into a museum with a camera, and see what they say. Yngvarr (t) (c) 09:39, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

Mmmmmm no i wont go do research, i know hte copyright law it part of my job, and as such that image breach the copyright law, and wikipedia coudl easily delete the entire article, i aint saying get rid of it i am saying do more to make it acceptable.--Andrewcrawford (talk) 09:44, 10 July 2008 (UTC) i suggest you do more research as it sounds liek your the tpy eof person who thinks downloading is legal.

I suggest this conversation ends, and I will thank you for putting words in to my mouth, and I will recommend that you don't impersonate a lawyer. Have a day. Yngvarr (t) (c) 10:04, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

I gave the image a rationalle, explaining its use and supplied the non-free screenshot template, what else is there to do? —T-borg (T | C) 10:27, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

You do what you did, that's all there needs to be done; I'll unwatch this article and let the lawyer work with you on this. Yngvarr (t) (c) 10:41, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

Tidy up

Ok i am in mid process of finish off another article i am working on once i have finished tha ti plan to wokr this one, jst now it is referenced or such so i plan to reference it and ad more information where appiroate. Does any one have any objection or stuf fthey liek to be kept or removed?--Andrewcrawford (talk) 17:44, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

• I am about to start on the clean up of this page so if there anything people like to say before i start please do so but if something is removed and you want and think it should be there please feel free to discuss it with me i will probably add it back as long as i can source it.--Andrewcrawford (talk) 11:43, 22 July 2008 (UTC)