Talk:Gandhigiri

This article was nominated for deletion on 6 August 2007. The result of the discussion was no consensus.

Archives

/Archive 1

Delete

This article is on a ', a criterion for deletion. Please do not forget that Wikipedia is not a dictionary. It is recommended that some part of this article be merged into Lage Raho Munna Bhai, especially that United States Citizenship and Immigration Services bit. See WP:NEO. Ranvir Sena 09:15, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough or Merge re: Wikipedia:Avoid neologisms. -Classicfilms 16:39, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No merge and Keep. despite being a neologism, this is a verifiable article from reliable sources. There are newspaper article on this topic, not only about Gandhigiri. It deserves its own article.--Dwaipayan (talk) 03:57, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Merge this article into Lage Raho Munna Bhai. Gman124 (talk) 15:16, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This article isn't simply about a neologism. It reports on and discusses a cultural phenomenon in India that is complex and important enough to deserve an entry. Don't remove it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.162.109.21 (talk) 13:56, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

NPOV?

Can someone identify the NPOV problem here? I'm not seeing any discussion about it. Thanks, Hobit (talk) 02:49, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Newly coined or newly popularised?

The lead calls the term "relatively new", but then says it was "popularized" by the 2006 film, implying that it did exist (but at a lower level of popularity) beforehand. Could we please have some history of the term pre-2006 - who used it, when, where, how often etc? Loganberry (Talk) 12:05, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Gandhigiri. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:21, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]