This article is part of WikiProject Fishes, an attempt to organise a detailed guide to all topics related to Fish taxa. To participate, you can edit the attached article, or contribute further at WikiProject Fishes. This project is an offshoot of the WikiProject Tree of Life.FishesWikipedia:WikiProject FishesTemplate:WikiProject FishesFishes articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sharks, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sharks on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SharksWikipedia:WikiProject SharksTemplate:WikiProject Sharksshark articles
The contents of the Borneo river shark page were merged into Ganges shark on 22 January 2018. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page.
Recently G. fowlerae and G. siamensis have been reclassified as synonyms of G. gangeticus. Since all of the articles are relatively short, already contain duplicate information, and are unlikely to be expanded independently, I propose that we merge them all into the article Ganges shark (G. gangeticus). -Vandraedha (talk) 10:03, 11 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Agree. For the Borneo river shark, that seems quite clear-cut and the article has no important additional information. Irrawaddy river shark could also be usefully merged in but is probably worth a section on its own - as I'm getting the impression that the reclassification is less clear there and the sole specimen had some morphological differences, retaining some discussion of those & likely status would be useful.--Elmidae (talk · contribs) 13:03, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Merged. Most new content was condensed into a new "Taxonomy" section, with an additional "Conservation" paragraph for the Irrawaddy river shark. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 06:50, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I changed the external link from a bare generic link to the WRMS species template to point to the exact page on WoRMS. I do believe that the template itself is beneficial to the page, because it adds several maintenance categories if certain facts don't match. However, after looking at it on the page, I'm not sure that putting that template in External Links is the best place for it. Feel free to move it around (or completely remove it) if you feel that it works better elsewhere. Are there any other opinions? P.S. - I don't get offended when material I add is removed or changed to make a positive improvement to the page, but I do appreciate feedback when that happens so that I can improve my editing. :-) Vandraedha (talk|contribs) 18:58, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Good question! I would imagine that historically, it is quite possible that a the 2 species have interacted. However, I"m not sure how probable that interaction is. Considering the rarity and elusiveness of both species (especially the ganges shark), it is unlikely that such an interaction has been documented. Much of the documentation/information about ganges sharks comes from written journals and museum specimens. If you find out the answer, please add it, along with your reliable source, to the relevant articles. :-) Vandraedha (talk|contribs) 17:37, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]