Talk:Gardens of Versailles

Gardens of Versailles is a former featured article candidate. Please view the links under Article milestones below to see why the nomination was archived. For older candidates, please check the archive.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
April 30, 2008	Peer review	Reviewed
May 17, 2008	Featured article candidate	Not promoted
July 3, 2008	Peer review	Reviewed

Current status: Former featured article candidate

France High‑importance

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Architecture High‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

This subarticle is kept separate from the main article, Palace of Versailles, due to size or style considerations.

Pictures

The article only contains two actual (relatively) pictures of the gardens !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.244.1.78 (talk) 22:38, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I agree here. Although there are now more than just two images of the gardens, the majority of the images used on this page depict how the garden used to look as opposed to how they now look. I think that there should be more current imagery used within this article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kmwetherton (talk • contribs) 18:56, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Gardens of Versailles. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131017023649/http://www.louvrepourtous.fr/Ahae-a-Versailles-le-privilege-de,763.html to http://www.louvrepourtous.fr/Ahae-a-Versailles-le-privilege-de,763.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:06, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Gardens of Versailles. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.chateauversailles.fr/fr/331_Quelques_chiffres.php
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090413015103/http://www.chateauversailles.fr/fr/331_Quelques_chiffres.php to http://www.chateauversailles.fr/fr/331_Quelques_chiffres.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:50, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Gardens of Versailles. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141218190941/http://www.chateauversailles.fr/news-/events/other-events/the-water-theatre-grove to http://www.chateauversailles.fr/news-/events/other-events/the-water-theatre-grove

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:24, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Better lead image needed

I respectfully think think the article needs a better lead image, that's taken at ground level, not from an airplane. You can't see any of the famous aspects of the garden, or get any idea of what it actually looks like. The aerial image can be later in the article, but I think the lead image should a view of the garden as visitors see it. Cordially, SiefkinDR (talk) 19:51, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I don't really agree - the most "famous aspect" of the garden is surely its sheer size, which this conveys well. There is plenty of room just below the infobox for at least two other images. The view from above (from the palace) was an important consideration in the design - much of which makes less sense at ground level. Johnbod (talk) 03:31, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I understand your point of view, but I'm afraid I still don't think this is the best image. The view of the garden from the terrace of the palace was an important consideration, but it's not at all the same as the view from an airplane, I think the garden is more famous for the fountains, the Marie Antoinette garden, the flower beds and the Trianons than it is for the sheer size. You can't recognize any of the famous park features in the airborne image. I think a lead image should be an inconic, familiar image. How about a small montage of three images, like the Palace? Cordially, SiefkinDR (talk) 11:17, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No, I really hate those, & they have issues for mobile users. A fountain just looks like a fountain, even if big, & I'm amazed you think the (inauthentic) flowerbeds are famous. The Trianons have their own articles. But if you want, add some other photo in the box, but put the aerial view, fixed at a larger size, below, and one other photo. Johnbod (talk) 15:44, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]