Jump to content

Talk:Geelong Ring Road

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Section 4

[edit]

Where is section 4?, section 4 should be included as well! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 58.168.57.62 (talk) 09:02, 4 May 2007 (UTC).[reply]

A10

[edit]

What is the source for Princes Highway's A10? --Sk-4 (talk) 05:07, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

VicRoads Geelong Ring Road Project office confirmed Princes Highway through Geelong will we re-numbered A10 on the opening of Section 3 of the Ring Road (19-12-08). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.130.9.194 (talk) 01:12, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

video of stage 1 and 2, southbound being opened to the general public.

[edit]

http://au.youtube.com/watch?v=vVgZmHvyCj8 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 118.208.181.69 (talk) 10:34, 17 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced criticism

[edit]

The Criticism section was greatly expanded on many months ago and includes many claims that remain unsourced. Might be worth trimming it if no sources can be found. Thedangerouskitchen (talk) 21:25, 24 January 2010 (UTC) Agree, it reads like the rants of someone who is annoyed they built the road near his house —Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.253.47.9 (talk) 05:30, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This newspaper article from 2002 below covers some of the criticism topics https://www.facebook.com/geelonghistory/photos/pcb.587085424830030/587085394830033/?type=3&theater — Preceding unsigned comment added by 27.32.228.253 (talk) 23:17, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This newspaper article from 1991 below covers some of the criticism topics https://www.facebook.com/photo?fbid=1749723538856345&set=pcb.1814376125665791 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.214.51.47 (talk) 04:11, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

More Geelong Advertiser articles discusing thering road vs bay bridge debate prior to construction. https://www.facebook.com/photo?fbid=1751550032007029&set=pcb.1816219558814781 https://www.facebook.com/photo?fbid=1751550025340363&set=pcb.1816219558814781 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.214.51.47 (talk) 22:43, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Trouble archiving links on the article

[edit]

Hello. I am finding myself repeatedly archiving links on this page. This usually happens when the archive doesn't recognize the archive to be good.

This could be because the link is either a redirect, or I am unknowingly archiving a dead link. Please check the following links to see if it's redirecting, or in anyway bad, and fix them, if possible.

In any event this will be the only notification in regards to these links, and I will discontinue my attempts to archive these pages.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 12:30, 12 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Geelong Ring Road. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 12:57, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Geelong Ring Road. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:07, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Geelong Ring Road. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:15, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Geelong Ring Road. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:17, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]