Talk:George Johnstone Hope

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Biography: Military

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the military biography work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Military history: Biography / Maritime / British / European / Napoleonic era

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military biography task force
	Maritime warfare task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	Napoleonic era task force (c. 1792 – 1815)

London Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

New word?

Does the word "reqreded" exist, or is it a typo? If real, will someone please define it for me? PKKloeppel (talk) 13:17, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If it was a real word, I wonder what it would mean? As it is not, I changed it to "rewarded" which appears to be the sense intended, and given the article a proper copyedit. The original article had lots more such typos. Well spotted! Jonathan Oldenbuck (talk) 15:53, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hope's faux pas.

The article states that: In 1798, however, whilst commanding HMS Alcmene, Hope made a serious faux pas, when he assumed that Admiral Nelson would have called off his passage to Egypt in the face of poor weather. He accordingly took the frigates under his command back to Gibraltar, thus denying Nelson his scouts at a pivotal point in the campaign and earning a furious rebuke from his commander.

Does anybody have a reference for this, and when exactly did it happen? I think Hope arrived in Aboukir Bay on the 13/08/1798. Was he supposed to be there earlier, in time for the Battle of the Nile perhaps?--Ykraps (talk) 08:53, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure that this is fair. Certainly most reports put the blame elsewhere. When Nelson's squadron sailed from Gibraltar on 9th May, he had with him the Emerald, Terpichore and Bonne Citoyenne as well as the various ships of the line. However, these three escorts parted company from the rest of the squadron in a severe gale on 21st, south of the Hyères. Laird Clowes (Vol. 4, page 354) reports that "Unhappily, St Vincent, who supposed that the Emerald, Terpichore and Bonne Citoyenne were still with Nelson, omitted to send to his subordinate any more frigates".

It is correct that the Emerald, Alcmène and Bonne Citoyenne finally joined the squadron on 13th August (and the Seahorse independently on 17th August) following the battle; whether Nelson expected them earlier, I'm not sure; but I don't think they were ever instructed to be there. Certainly Nelson constantly bemoaned his lack of frigates foir scouting purposes; his letter to St Vincent of 20th July (sent from Syracuse) says "Every moment I have to regret the Frigates having left me, to which must be attributed my ignorance of the movements of the Enemy" (Dispatches and Letters, Vol. 3 of the Nicolas edition, page 45); on the 23rd, in a letter to Sir William Hamilton (idem, page 48), he adds the bitter postscript "No Frigates ! - to which has been, and may again, be attributed the loss of the French Fleet"; and after the battle on 5th August he wrote a general letter "to the Captains of any Frigates Captain Berry may meet with", saying "I am, and have been, very much distressed for Frigates, and hope the Captains of them under my command, will use their utmost endeavours to join me", then adding where his squadron could most likely be found (idem, page 92). But there is no specific mention anywhere in the correspondence of any frigate or its captain by name in this connection. Rif Winfield (talk) 07:12, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. In that case, unless anyone objects, I think I will remove/rewrite that sentence.--Ykraps (talk) 09:35, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on George Johnstone Hope. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060907081719/http://www.nmm.ac.uk/searchbin/searchs.pl?flashy=et1740z&flash=true to http://www.nmm.ac.uk/searchbin/searchs.pl?flashy=et1740z&flash=true

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:19, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]