Jump to content

Talk:Gold Coast Coastal Cycle Route

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

WHAT IS A GANGWAY IN THE SCOOPE OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.215.148.33 (talk) 15:52, 14 October 2009 (UTC) Have a look at http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/gangway Gangways for Mechanical engineering might mean the walkway built for maintenance workers to get around mechanical plant and equipment. Gangways are also articulating ramps or bridges to get from a dock to a ship or from a pontoon to the land. Mechanical engineers may be involved in the mechanism of articulation to adjust the ramp for tides and swell. 124.177.127.92 (talk) 07:48, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Surfers SouthCommunity Comments

[edit]

- Comments are listed below both in opposition and support of the Surfers South Oceanway. Stakeholders have responded with the comments listed below to the announcement that Surfers South Ocanway works will be underway by April 2012. The comments have been sourced and summarised from the reader feedback pages from The Gold Coast Bulletin website [1]. The purpose of summarising comments is to illustrate the merits of propositions and beliefs both in support and opposition of the Surfers South Oceanway to assist with tactics for sustainable transport investment.


Surfers South Opposition

[edit]
  • "... big ugly concrete ribbon ... using my rate money ...? No thanks. Go walk on the beach.... only people who will use this are a few locals ... won't promote tourism"

-

-

-

  • "... PRO Crimeway Voters ... No Security Audit, No Security Guards .... AND where do you think vehicles will park ... metered Parking, there goes your off street free parking."

-

  • "... drunken teenagers peeing in my front yard, having sex, yelling screaming fighting, stealing outdoor furniture, destroying property, graffiti... give crime a bigger boost .. out of control drunks a platform called a walkway to party at night?"

-

  • "... tram that clogs traffic ..how out of touch... Make Garfield one way like Hedges - people don't walk because of wind not because there is no walkway. ... wasted money ... Drunks, rubbish, naked teenagers & brown snakes -the dunes of the GC..."

-

  • " ...Stay off, Dune Regeneration in Progress Yet put a concrete footpath through the Dunes... Where are the conservationists?"

-

-

  • "... Why Build another footpath destroying the dunes in the process ? Then you have 2 footpaths for council to neglect ? 2 footpaths for schoolies to trash bottles .. doesn't fund maintenance yet forks out $$$ on a new footpath?"

-

  • "... meeting tonight Simple solution: Garfield one way street say NO to plan ..."

-

  • "...And it's more than just a couple of unit owners that will fight this 'crimeway'"

- -

Support

[edit]

-

  • "GO Girl ... long overdue .. know there is a'Gazetted' road but are loath to admit it"

-

  • "even Old Dragons will like the Oceanway once it's actually built"

-

  • " keep it up & build it. You've got my vote"

-

  • "I have no doubt ... good election issue ... promise to complete this in a SHORT time frame will garner a lot of support"

-

-

-

-

  • "... complete the Oceanway regardless...right of all ratepayers to have access ..."

-

-

-

  • "The oceanway is long overdue..."

-

  • "... ALL major beaches have a decent wide footpath... Build the oceanway!!

-

-

  • "... There is a minority of vested interests who do not want it. Keep it up for the Majority"
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Gold Coast Coastal Cycle Route. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:06, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]