Talk:Golden Era Records

Australia: Music Low‑importance

	Australia portal Golden Era Records is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian music (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Hip hop Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hip hop, a collaborative effort to build a useful resource for and improve the coverage of hip hop on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Hip hopWikipedia:WikiProject Hip hopTemplate:WikiProject Hip hopHip hop articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Record Labels

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Record Labels, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of record labels on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Record LabelsWikipedia:WikiProject Record LabelsTemplate:WikiProject Record Labelsrecord labels articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been marked as needing immediate attention.

Own page?

As Golden Era is relatively new, and the amount of published references is quite small, perhaps the Golden Era section on the Hilltop Hoods page will suffice. VoltageX (talk) 13:32, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The article appears to have been converted into a redirect as a result of a merge. If you feel deletion is warranted please refer to 'Wikipedia:Redirects for Discussion' 97.115.129.240 (talk) 03:25, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Why merge it when the label has plenty of room to grow with the growing demind of australian hiphop? the article will eventually come back onto wikipedia anyway. i say we keep it. Reddevilbatcave (talk) 06:31, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Golden Era Records, despite being new, is still a company. It's growing, and one would think it warrants its own page -4/22/2010-MCAspire (talk) 13:43, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that the page needs to remain at this stage—a review may be warranted if the label stalls, but it appears to be developing at a significant pace, and into a significant size.--Soulparadox (talk) 14:27, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

K21

I have found one citation for the addition of K21 to the artists section of the Golden Era page, but a more official citation will need to be inserted as soon as possible—the artist page on the label's website does not include K21 and none of K21's web pages, including his Facebook and official website, indicate that he has been signed to the label as of yet.--Soulparadox (talk) 14:27, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, K21's addition has been made official and I have added this to the article; however, he does not have a Wikipedia page, so please do not inaccurately link "K21" in this article to the Korean military-related page. Thanks in advance.--Soulparadox (talk) 04:23, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Golden Era Records. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:09, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]