Talk:Golden Film/GA1

GA Reassessment

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

I will be doing the GA Reassessment on this article in accordance with the GA sweeps project. H1nkles (talk) 01:59, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The article is still good, it's a fairly simple subject and comprehensive article. I note that ref [13] appears to be a WP site, which isn't a credible source. Otherwise it's fine and I will keep it as a GA. H1nkles (talk) 02:06, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is discussed in this peer review, see the discussion after the point "Most refs look good but you cannot cite Wikipedia as a reliable source - ref 12." Rubenescio (talk) 09:36, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have updated the article with three new awards and 2008 statistical data. Would adding a reference for each awarded film, 62 extra references in total, really improve this article? Rubenescio (talk) 10:26, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]