Jump to content

Talk:Graduate Theological Union/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1

Brochure

The article read like a brochure, and was properly tagged as such. i removed the promotional language, but the various facts still need sources, and the redlinks in the notable faculty/alumni need trimming or citations. Also, for the importance of the subject, more (npov) history and detail of the school are needed.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 16:09, 10 July 2011 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Graduate Theological Union. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 19:08, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Graduate Theological Union. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:46, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

Seal

User Starlight.wizard (talk · contribs) continues to without explanation or discussion remove the seal from this page's infobox, per WP:UNIGUIDE:

I do not wish to engage in a further edit war. Malayy (talk) 18:25, 5 May 2018 (UTC)

Starlight.wizard prefers the organization's logo, correct? Have you considered an WP:RFC? PhilKnight (talk) 23:25, 5 May 2018 (UTC)
Thank you, I will do that. Malayy (talk) 01:01, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
@Malayy: Why didn't you just ask Starlight.wizard on his or her Talk page?
@ElKevbo: I had already warned them on their talk page, with no response. They do not include any summaries with their edits, and didn't when reverting my edits three times. Malayy (talk) 15:15, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
@PhilKnight: Why would you advise an editor to begin an RfC before advising that editor to try talking to the other editor??? ElKevbo (talk) 13:20, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

RfC on infobox images

The consensus is that the primary image should be the institutional seal, not the logo.

Cunard (talk) 05:20, 17 June 2018 (UTC)

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Should the primary image be the institutional seal or logo? Malayy (talk) 01:12, 6 May 2018 (UTC)


The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.