Talk:Great Royal Wife

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ancient Egypt, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Egyptological subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ancient EgyptWikipedia:WikiProject Ancient EgyptTemplate:WikiProject Ancient EgyptAncient Egypt articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Ancient Egypt to-do list:

Needed articles.

We should have an article on every pyramid and every nome in Ancient Egypt. I'm sure the rest of us can think of other articles we should have.

Cleanup.

To start with, most of the general history articles badly need attention. And I'm told that at least some of the dynasty articles need work. Any other candidates?

Standardize the Chronology.

A boring task, but the benefit of doing it is that you can set the dates !(e.g., why say Khufu lived 2589-2566? As long as you keep the length of his reign correct, or cite a respected source, you can date it 2590-2567 or 2585-2563)

Stub sorting

Anyone? I consider this probably the most unimportant of tasks on Wikipedia, but if you believe it needs to be done . . .

Data sorting.

This is a project I'd like to take on some day, & could be applied to more of Wikipedia than just Ancient Egypt. Take one of the standard authorities of history or culture -- Herotodus, the Elder Pliny, the writings of Breasted or Kenneth Kitchen, & see if you can't smoothly merge quotations or information into relevant articles. Probably a good exercise for someone who owns one of those impressive texts, yet can't get access to a research library.

Women's History Low‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Biography: Royalty and Nobility

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Royalty and Nobility (assessed as Mid-importance).

Heiress

The Heiress theory has been refuted since 1983 (Gay Robins). This theory is no longer accepted by Egyptologists. --AnnekeBart (talk) 21:37, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hatshepsut never married her father, there is no evidence that Neferure married Tuthmosis III (that all hinges on an stela that may or not have been reinscribed). The statements about the God's Wife of Amun were somewhat confusing, so I cleaned that up. There is also no evidence that Nefertiti was a co-ruler or regent. Those kind of speculations do not really belong in wikipedia I think. Or should be clearly labeled as speculative? --AnnekeBart (talk) 22:10, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Misplaced Section

The "Elsewhere in Africa" table is in the wrong place. How do we move it to the correct one? Maximajorian Viridio (talk) 19:51, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Maximajorian Viridio I have split out the WP:COATRACK to Great Wife--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 03:35, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Queen Onakitu Fatima12.54.112.206 (talk) 07:16, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Took the Ⲟⲩⲏⲣ Ⲟⲩⲣϣ part out

This title is unsourced and doesn't appear anywhere else that I could find. I suspect it's fanfic: ⲟⲩⲏⲣ ultimately comes from wr "great", but means "how many" in Coptic (just like wr already could in earlier Egyptian). I have never seen ⲟⲩⲣϣ before nor does it appear in Crum's Dictionary, but I suspect it's a typo for ⲟⲩⲣⲱ. As it was, it didn't make any sense and also cannot be the direct successor to Hm.t nsw(t) wr.t which comes from completely different lexical material. If you want it back, please provide a cite. Thanks! MikuChan39 (talk) 22:13, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]