Talk:HMS Assurance (1780)/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs) 01:29, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
I'll get to this shortly--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 01:29, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
- Images appropriately licensed
- Link sister ship in the caption
- Done.
- Link launched in the lede, add link to ship class on first use
- Added link, I think the ship class is already linked where necessary
- Delete the inflation calculators; warships are capital costs, not consumer goods. 3 million pounds today might outfit a modern warships boats, but it's hugely wrong
- Done.
- Change the link for long gun to naval long gun
- Done.
- Clarify that these are smoothbores
- Done.
- Her name was a historical one of Royal Navy use, originating in 1605 awkward
- Rephrased.
- Fix the link to St Augustine
- Oops! Done.
- Clarify that the 1793 refit was to restore her as a frigate, not as a troopship
- Done.
@Sturmvogel 66: Thanks again! My responses are above. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 19:54, 29 February 2024 (UTC)