Talk:Hall v Durham Catholic School Board

Canada: Law Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Canadian law.

LGBTQ+ studies

This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies articles

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Article title

Should be renamed to Marc Hall v. Durham Catholic School Board, as it is the focus of the article; the information on Marc Hall himself is scarce, as it is of no particular relevance, since Hall is not notable apart from his involvement in this case. Comments? GregorB (talk) 00:43, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Renamed as suggested - hope that's OK... GregorB (talk) 23:18, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Case withdrawn?

It appears that the case was later withdrawn after the injunction was set.[1] Might be worth mentioning. — Io Katai ᵀᵃˡᵏ 01:10, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hall v Durham Catholic School Board. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071127013243/http://www.csse.ca/CJE/Articles/FullText/CJE28-3/CJE28-3-gracewells.pdf to http://www.csse.ca/CJE/Articles/FullText/CJE28-3/CJE28-3-gracewells.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:08, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Error in Describing Injunction

The article states that the order by Mr. Justice McKinnon prevented the respondent school board from cancelling the prom. That is not true:

The defendants have undertaken to the court not to cancel the prom in the event that I granted the plaintiff's request [for] relief and I accordingly make no further order.

[2]

Can someone please confirm my reading of the decision? — B.Sc-bound (talk) 06:38, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]