Jump to content

Talk:History of Baltimore City College

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former featured articleHistory of Baltimore City College is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on October 20, 2008.
Did You Know Article milestones
DateProcessResult
July 26, 2007Good article nomineeListed
July 27, 2007Peer reviewReviewed
August 25, 2007Featured article candidateNot promoted
September 25, 2007Peer reviewReviewed
November 28, 2007Featured article candidatePromoted
July 17, 2021Featured article reviewDemoted
Did You Know A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on July 22, 2007.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ...that 1900 was the only year in the history of Baltimore City College that no public commencement was held because the students made fun of the professors in the school's yearbook?
Current status: Former featured article

GA On Hold

[edit]

This article is very comprehensive in its way but the coverage of it comprehensiveness is not very broad.

  • The vast majority of the article is about the formation and then architectural, real estate history of the school
  • The academic development of the school is not covered well. It starts with the original platform of the school, the academic evolution of the curriculum is not explained well at all. There is a big jump to the 21st century status.
  • Secondly, it mentioned changes in admissions procedure for blacks and females. What is the admissions procedure? Is there an entrance exam? Admission by pay? Has the selection criteria changed over the years as the school's philosophy has changed? The main article talks about the IB being introduced. This should be in the history article, in addition to other curriculum changes.
  • Are there ups and downs in the academic performance of the school? Were there glorious periods when the school dominated the academic examinations and sports leagues? Were there bad periods when performance went down or when there was student unrest in the school? How has the co-curricular evolved
  • The modern section is a bit POV. It cites one paper saying the school is very very good. However, the main Baltimore City College says that some national surveys ranked it 200+, so it seems that a wider array of ratings should be shown.
  • Also I think that the female admission controversy should be expanded if possible. If not it should be merged with the black admissions.
  • Sources
    • Some paragraphs are missing sources or only have sources for the first half of the them. Please fill these out
    • Where you use the same book many times, do not repeat the whole book over and over. Have a "Notes" section where the shorthand reference is used, and have a "REferences" section where the full book is listed. eg, see Arthur Morris

The article is in good shape, it just has some black holes. But judging by the coverage of the other parts, it is simply a matter of filling in, because the quality in what is already there is very good. Thanks, Blnguyen (bananabucket) 08:02, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Here is the verdict.Blnguyen (bananabucket) 02:22, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the enhancements. The article is really well rounded now. Good work.Blnguyen (bananabucket) 02:22, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fixes needed

[edit]
  • Please see WP:DASH and fix throughout. Did this guy *really* punctuate like this? The subject of chronic lamentation,—the Baltimore City College Building,—which for ... that's just wrong. yes he did write that way you can check it out Golem88991 19:22, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Please see WP:MOS#Images.  Done
  • There's a missing footnote.  Done
  • Please review WP:LEAD.  Done IMO, the lead goes into too much detail.
  • Pls see WP:FN about how to employ named refs to eliminate repeats, for example:
    • ^ "The Top of the Class", Newsweek. Retrieved on May 22, 2007.
    • ^ "The Top of the Class", Newsweek. Retrieved on May 8, 2007.  Done different urls so renamed titles to conform with titles of articles.Golem88991 19:26, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

SandyGeorgia (Talk) 18:28, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyediting

[edit]

I've gone through the article. Most of what I found was punctuation and fixing run-on sentences.

A of non-punctuation couple of issues:

1. Where are the references for the section about the curriculum changing to a single track? I graduated in the mid 1990s and there were distinct "A" and "B" courses, as well as AP classes. Plus, I remember reading an article on the Alumni Association wanting the school to devote more resources to the "A" course as opposed to IB, giving the impression that the "A" course was still in use at the school. The article gives the impression that it is not.

2. By what time/year did the Howard Street building become overcrowded? --WriterThesp77 18:54, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on History of Baltimore City College. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 07:30, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on History of Baltimore City College. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 14:25, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on History of Baltimore City College. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:40, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on History of Baltimore City College. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:44, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on History of Baltimore City College. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:26, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on History of Baltimore City College. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:21, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

FA concerns

[edit]

After reviewing this article for WP:URFA/2020, I am concerned that it does not meet the featured article criteria anymore. I have outlined some of my concerns below:

  • The lede is too long
  • The article does not mention events post-2008. It needs an update.
  • There is MOS:SANDWICH with the images in the "Reconstruction" section
  • Image captions are too long and need alt text

Is anyone interested in bringing this article back to FA standards? Z1720 (talk) 15:26, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]