Jump to content

Talk:History of Malawi

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia



British Protectorates

[edit]

There is very little on the British Central African Protectorate, but an article of that name has five paras which would be relevant here and could perhaps be moved. Apart from the independence movement and the Federation there is very little on Nyasaland here or anwhere else and that could be moved here, and some detail ought to be added.
There were redirects for Nyasaland and Nyasaland Protectorate which went to the Malawi page but I have edited them to here, History of Malawi.Rexparry sydney 02:56, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Devlin and Armitage Reports

[edit]

Perhaps something should be added about these - produced in 1959 regarding British police methods there. I don't know enough about it to do it myself. Malick78 11:24, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

diplomatic relationship with apartheid South Africa

[edit]

the article says "Banda was one of the very few post-colonial African leaders to maintain diplomatic relations with apartheid South Africa" and the article on Banda says "He was also the only African ruler to establish diplomatic ties with South Africa during apartheid." If there were other African leaders to maintain relations, who were they? Or is the signifant difference between maintaining and establishing? thanks Richardson mcphillips1 (talk) 18:42, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Good question. The Foreign relations of South Africa article says:

During the apartheid era, South Africa was diplomatically shunned by the vast majority of African nations, with notable exceptions being Malawi and Ivory Coast.

I'm guessing that Ivory Coast maintained the diplomatic relations that the French had had. The Malawi case must be more significant as it is in southern as opposed to western Africa. Itsmejudith (talk) 11:28, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Maravi

[edit]

The section on the Maravi Empire has more lines than the main article itself... --Againme (talk) 11:52, 24 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]


[edit]

Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request it's removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

  • http://www.historyofnations.net/africa/malawi.html
    Triggered by \bhistoryofnations\.net\b on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 15:32, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on History of Malawi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:22, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ayao

[edit]

The section on the Ayao is very interesting but lacks any detailed references. It seems to be more like a personal essay and definitely isn't written from a neutral point of view. Much is said about the wearing of long robes and kofias and other marks of civilisation, whereas no word of criticism is given of the appalling human rights abuse carried out by the Yao slavers and of tens of thousands of slaves marched in appalling conditions to the coast every year by the Jumbe of Nkhotakota. Something should be said on both sides, I think, good and bad. Although it is a point well made that that the history of Islam has been more or less ignored in accounts of Malawi up to now, yet this essay is clearly written from a pro-Muslim point of view.

Moreover not only this section but the whole article lacks references. Only three footnotes are given, two of which are to newspaper articles, and only one to a serious academic work. In a serious historical article each statement should be referenced with source and page number. An example is the article Cabinet Crisis of 1964 in Malawi, which has 87 references and a bibliography of 15 well-researched academic works. Here, although the topic is much larger, only three books are mentioned in the bibliography and two more in the text (none of them with dates or publishers); surely there are far more to be found on the history of Malawi than that. Kanjuzi (talk) 04:36, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

English

[edit]

What is the history 105.0.0.101 (talk) 06:24, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]