Jump to content

Talk:History of Nebraska

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

needs expansion

[edit]

the article obviously needs a much fuller coverage of the social, economic, political, and cultural history of Nebraska and the Nebraskans since statehood. I will try to add some sections with citations. Rjensen (talk) 21:30, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have never given much thought to concentrating on this article. I will follow your lead Rjensen. • Freechild'sup? 22:13, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
thanks -- I hope lots of kids in Nebraska will have an opportunity to use itRjensen (talk) 22:21, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The report on hispanic labor needs to be updated from 2003. The labor market has been adversely affected as of 2009-2011. There is a dispute between documented and undocumented imigrant numbers involved. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.19.44.20 (talk) 21:54, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This article focusses on post european-conquest history only, totally ignoring even the violent struggle between colonists and natives. It is thus obscuring large portions (millennia) of the territory's actual history. Until this is fixed, the article should be considered incomplete and perfunctory.

File:A Yool Carhenge2 02Sep03 exif.jpg Nominated for Deletion

[edit]
An image used in this article, File:A Yool Carhenge2 02Sep03 exif.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests February 2012
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:A Yool Carhenge2 02Sep03 exif.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 04:43, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that File:Iowa and Nebraska lands10.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on November 9, 2014. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2014-11-09. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. Thanks! — Crisco 1492 (talk) 01:12, 21 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Land offers in Iowa and Nebraska
An 1872 poster for the Burlington and Missouri River Railroad, offering land for settlement in Iowa and Nebraska. At this point in their histories, both states were attempting to attract immigrants and increase their populations, a form of boosterism in which the company participated. The railroad offered farmers the chance to purchase land grant parcels on easy credit terms; this poster advertises low prices, with 10 years credit and 6 percent interest. Through such efforts, railroads facilitated and accelerated the peopling and development of the Great Plains.Poster: Burlington and Missouri River Railroad; restoration: Lise Broer

State report

[edit]

I have a state report due tomorrow and I need notes Nicopico888 (talk) 23:05, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on History of Nebraska. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:10, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on History of Nebraska. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:16, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]