Talk:Honda Accord (North America eighth generation)

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Mazda6#2nd generation|second-generation Mazda6]] The anchor (#2nd generation) has been deleted by other users before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Rename to "Honda crosstour"

This name currently as it stands is very confusing. All the commercials and everything is saying "Honda Crosstour" not "Honda Accord (North America eighth generation)" That is just long name and is technically wrong. This should be moved to simple and shorter name. 174.16.246.183 (talk) 20:05, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nevermind. i was little wrong on this one. Forget this suggestion. 174.16.246.183 (talk) 01:40, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Crosstour is more of a station wagon than SUV; needs its own page too 19:42, 18 February 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.28.49.140 (talk)

The Crosstour and regular Accord are different types of vehicles. Crosstour is a crossover type when regular Accord is a sedan (4-door) and a coupe (2-door); Crosstour has to have its own page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.206.37.89 (talk) 19:36, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The crossover is officially called the Honda Accord Crosstour, thus the reason for including it in the NA 8th gen Accord article. If there is enough detail to warrant its own article, then someone can create a separate Honda Accord Crosstour article and summarize it in a few sentences in this one. --Vossanova ^o< 19:44, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Is the use of the "Accord" name in front of "Crosstour" a mere marketing decision from Honda, or does the Crosstour share substantial components and systems with the sedan and coupe? Do they all share engine, driveline and overall architecture? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.177.128.100 (talk) 03:00, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Both? The Crosstour is in fact built from the Accord package using several Accord components, however it is also a completely different type of vehicle. This is very similar to how Nissan launched the Armada, marketing it at first with the "Pathfinder" name attached to it. Supposedly to give it some brand recognition and hoping that the Pathfinder's good name would have a positive effect on people's perception of the vehicle (The Armada and Pathfinder were also built from a common platform with many components in common). I think Honda recently announced that the "Accord" name would be dropped, leaving the vehicle simply called "Crosstour," but I can't confirm this at this time. I suggest that these be seperated as soon as Honda officially stops branding this vehicle as an Accord variant. Ghost650 (talk) 17:45, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Willy is right, he does need to sell them —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.43.108.55 (talk) 16:07, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I think the Crosstour should be split into a separate article. It's not the same car, so why have an article on the same page? 68.37.41.158 (talk) 21:37, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Front/All-Wheel

There is no information about which models/engines can have all-wheel. It this option available to all models? --129.247.247.238 (talk) 12:38, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Brake Wear Lawsuit

I found the brake wear lawsuit paragraph (under "Safety") had been deleted a few months ago with only a cursory "not notable" reason given. I've restored it. Please discuss any notability or other problems here first before deleting it again. This was a large class action involving a brake design defect with safety implications that received coverage in the major news media. This is why it deserves mention. The sources given for this section are an NYT article, the official court website & related court documents. I'm no expert on Wikipedia guidelines but seems like this needs some prior discussion if it's going to be removed. Jmathis555 (talk) 12:54, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 19 May 2014

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

49.205.5.159 (talk) 08:41, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format. NiciVampireHeart 09:24, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Honda Accord (North America eighth generation). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:24, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Honda Accord (North America eighth generation). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:54, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Full Size Sedan?

Shouldn't there be two lines for the Class since the sedan is a full size 120 cuft interior while the coupe is mid sized 50.75.156.91 (talk) 13:44, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]