Talk:Honolulu Civil Beat

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted from this draft on 10 November 2015 by reviewer Anne Delong (talk · contribs).

Hawaii Mid‑importance

	Hawaii portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hawaii, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hawaii on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HawaiiWikipedia:WikiProject HawaiiTemplate:WikiProject HawaiiHawaii articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Journalism Mid‑importance

	Journalism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Deletion of "criticism" section

The section was unsourced and no editor responded to a request for sourcing posted in 2015. I did a very extensive search and could find no criticism in reliable sources or anywhere else about its content, save for a note in the Nonprofit Quarterly, which lacks a Wikipedia article which did not support the existing text. (The Nonprofit Quarterly is a decades-old publication and should not be confused with the Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, which does have an article.) The deleted section noted that the Civil Beat reflected somewhat the founder's philosophy and featured coverage of political issues, but that was in fact the reason it was founded, including a maintaining a civic watchdog role. It seemed it was overdue to delete the section. At the same time the article overlooked a major change in the publication's status, becoming a nonprofit last year and dropping its paywall, so I brought it more up to date. Activist (talk) 19:16, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]